Finally the Official 7th CPC Concordance tables for pre 2016 Pensioners issued by DoPPW on 6.7.2017. The Department of Pensioners and Pensioner Welfare has prepared Concordance table to facilitate revision of pension of pre-2016 pensioners/family pensioners by the concerned pension sanctioning authorities. This is the authoritative tables and based on this Concordance tables, the revision of Pension for pre 2016 Pensioners will be done.
Official 7th CPC Concordance tables for pre 2016 Pensioners issued by DoPPW
F.No.38/37/2016-P&PW(A)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, P.G. and Pensions
Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare
3rd floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi
Dated 6th July, 2017
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Revision of pension of pre-2016 pensioners / family pensioners in implementation of Government’s decision on the recommendations of the 7th Central Pay Commission Concordance tables- regarding.
The undersigned is directed to refer to this Department’s OM of even number dated 12.05.2017 on the above subject and to say that instructions were issued for revision of pension / family pension with effect from 01.01.2016 in respect of Central civil pensioners / family pensioners who retired/died prior to 01.01.2016 by notionally fixing their pay in the pay matrix recommended by the 7th Central Pay Commission in the level corresponding to the pay in the pay scale / pay band and grade pay at which they retired I died. It was provided that 50% of such notional pay shall be the revised pension and 30% of the notional pay shall be the revised family pension w.e.f. 01.01.2016.
2. It was also provided that the revision of pension will be done by notional pay fixation under each intervening Pay Commission based on the formula for revision of pay. Based on the fitment tables provided by the Department of Expenditure, concordance tables for fixation of notional pay and pension / family pension of employees who retired/died in various grades during the 4th, 5th and 5th Pay Commission periods have been prepared and the same are enclosed herewith. In the case of those employees who retired/died before 01.01.1986, these concordance tables may be used based on their notional pay as on 01.01.1986, which was fixed in accordance with this Department’s OM No. 45/86/97-P&PW(D)(iii) dated 10.02.1998.
3. Separate tables have been given in respect of pre- 01.01.2016 pensioners who retired in the Group ‘D’ pay scales corresponding to 5th CPC grade pay of Rs. 1300/-, Rs. 1400/-, Rs. 1600/- and Rs. 1650/- {Table No. 1 to Table No. 4) and for pensioners who retired during 6th CPC period after upgradation to the Grade pay of Rs. 1800/- (Table No. 5 to Table No. 8). The pension/family pension of such pensioners/family pensioners may be revised using the appropriate Table.
4. These concordance tables have been prepared to facilitate revision of pension of pre-2016 pensioners/family pensioners by the concerned pension sanctioning authorities. Due care has been taken to prepare these concordance tables based on the fitment tables for fixation of pay from 4th to 5th, s” to 5th and 5th to ih Pay Commission. In case of any inconsistency in the concordance tables vis-a-vis the relevant rules/instructions, the notional pay and pension/family pension of pre-2016 pensioners/family pensioners may be fixed in accordance with the rules/instructions applicable for fixation of pay in the intervening Pay Commission periods.
5. It is requested that the pension of pre-2016 pensioners / family pensioners may be revised w.e.f. 01.01.2016 in accordance with the instructions contained in this Department’s OM of even no dated 12.05.2017 and using the concordance tables enclosed herewith.
6. This issues with the approval of Ministry of Finance ( Department of Expenditure) vide their Diary No. 1(13)/EV/2017 dated 05.07.2017.
sd/-
(Harjit Singh)
Director
Authority: http://www.pensionersportal.gov.in/
Get Free Email Updates
Follow us on Telegram Channel, Twitter & Facebook and Whatsapp Channel for all Latest News and Updates
defence personnel pension table rank wise and lengh of service is to be clearly shown not mixing with civil personnel. There is a confusion in the table. A table should be clear it is not clear for the defence personnel.
sIR,
i AM ALMOST FRUSTRATED BY REPEATING OUR REQUEST–PAY PENSION BASED ON OPTION 1, AND ALSO PAY THE SAME WITHIN A REASONABLE TIME TO ENABLE SUPER SENIOR PENSIONERS LIKE ME TO LEAD A DECENT LIFE.
i HAVE PUT IN 40+ YEARS OF SERVICE IN RAILWAYS AND THIS IS THE TREATMENT ONE GET FOR SUCH A DEDICATED WORK.
vaidyanathan
How should calculate pension of those pensioners who have been permanently absorbed in CPSU and now their 2/3rd pension has been restored from the date of their commutation as per DOPTs orders dated 23.06.2017
I also agree with the comments of mr ramamuthy.table 24 and 25 needs correction in this regard immediately or otherwise the affected pensioners will be in a disadvantage position.urgent action is required.
Te Grade Pay granted to pay scale of Rs 6500-10500 (under Fifth CPC regime) originally was Rs 4200. The Min. of Finance , DOE, vide their OM dated 13-11-2009, raised the quantum of Grade Pay to Rs 4600. Still, In Concordance Tables 24 and 25, the Grade Pay is shown as Rs 4200. This mistake needs to be corrected. Else it will deprive the concerned pensioners a considerable benefit otherwise entitled to.
P S Ramankutty
sir
there is a big loss to all of us pensioners by rejecting recommendation of pay commission option -1 by GOI Further it may be noted whenever we represent for justified benefits in any other cases govt takes stand that pay commission has not recommended, but in this case govt has taken a stand that records are not available for many long retired staff thus denying our legitimate rights of pension benefits recommended by paycommission and it shows double standard and also it is the fact that because some military personnels pension have been revised automatically some high level officers multification factor revised and pay at each stage are revised quitely and not a single Association are bringing this fact in any of their letter addressed to GOI while agitating for revision of salary or pension .I dont know why? Can any body enlighten me on this.